NLnl-learn

Voltooid verleden tijd (plusquamperfectum)

Past perfect: had gedaan, was gegaan

B1 · Intermediate · ≈ 24 min

When we tell a story about the past, there are almost always two layers: what happened — and what happened even before that. For the earlier layer, we need the past perfect (plusquamperfectum): had / was + past participle. The form is constructed exactly like the present perfect, except the auxiliary verb is in the past tense.

1. Form

Three tenses side-by-side
  • Tijd

    imperfectum

    Met hebben

    ik werkte

    Met zijn

    ik ging

    Meaning

    simple past

  • Tijd

    perfectum

    Met hebben

    ik heb gewerkt

    Met zijn

    ik ben gegaan

    Meaning

    past with a connection to the present

  • Tijd

    plusquamperfectum

    Met hebben

    ik had gewerkt

    Met zijn

    ik was gegaan

    Meaning

    past before another past

The participle does not change at all: gewerkt remains gewerkt. Only the auxiliary verb changes: heb → had, ben → was.

Conjugation of the auxiliary verb
Persoonhebbenzijn
ikhad gewachtwas vertrokken
jij / uhad gewachtwas vertrokken
hij / zij / hethad gewachtwas vertrokken
wij / jullie / zijhadden gewachtwaren vertrokken

In the plural, it's hadden and waren. There's nothing else to remember.

2. When to use this tense

The past perfect (plusquamperfectum) almost never stands alone in a sentence. It appears when there is a second point in the past, and it shows that an event happened before that point.

Two layers of one story
  • De trein was al vertrokken, toen ik op het perron kwam.

    The train had already left when I got to the platform.

    FirstDe trein was al vertrokken,
    Thentoen ik op het perron kwam.
  • Ik had mijn pas thuis laten liggen, dus ik moest terug.

    I had left my card at home, so I had to go back.

    FirstIk had mijn pas thuis laten liggen,
    Thendus ik moest terug.
  • Wij hadden gegeten, en daarna gingen we wandelen.

    We had eaten, and then we went for a walk.

    FirstWij hadden gegeten,
    Thenen daarna gingen we wandelen.

The word order in the sentence is flexible: the “earlier” event can come first or second. The tense indicates the sequence, not the position.

Three typical situations

  • Toen ik bij de huisarts kwam, was de wachtkamer al volgelopen.

    When I arrived at the doctor's, the waiting room was already full.

    Event before the moment of arrival — past perfect.

  • Ik kon niet betalen, want ik had mijn pinpas vergeten.

    I couldn't pay because I had forgotten my card.

    Explaining a reason: the reason happened earlier.

  • Ze vertelde dat ze net was verhuisd naar Eindhoven.

    She said that she had just moved to Eindhoven.

    Reporting: something that happened before the moment of telling.

3. With nadat — an almost obligatory combination

In a subordinate clause, the two verbs at the end can be placed in two orders, and both are correct: nadat we hadden gegeten and nadat we gegeten hadden. The first (the “red” order) is more common in writing, the second (the “green” order) in speech.

Dialoog — Waarom het misging

A colleague explains why they were late for a meeting.

  1. Bas

    Je was er gisteren niet. Wat was er gebeurd?

    You weren't here yesterday. What happened?

  2. Alex

    Een klein drama. Ik had de wekker wel gezet, maar op de verkeerde dag.

    A small drama. I had set the alarm, but for the wrong day.

    had gezet — before the moment of waking up.

  3. Bas

    Au. En de trein?

    Oh. And the train?

  4. Alex

    Toen ik op station Tilburg aankwam, was die net vertrokken. De volgende ging pas een halfuur later.

    When I arrived at Tilburg station, it had just left. The next one wasn't for another half an hour.

  5. Bas

    Had je niet even kunnen bellen?

    Couldn't you have called?

  6. Alex

    Mijn telefoon was onderweg leeggelopen. Nadat ik een oplader had geleend, was de vergadering al afgelopen.

    My phone had died on the way. By the time I had borrowed a charger, the meeting was already over.

    Nadat + past perfect is a classic combination.

  7. Bas

    Nou, dan heb je een goed verhaal. Volgende keer stuur je gewoon een appje.

    Well, at least it's a good story. Next time, just send a message.

4. Common mistakes

✕ Not like this

Toen ik aankwam, is de trein al vertrokken.

✓ Correct

Toen ik aankwam, was de trein al vertrokken.

When I arrived, the train had already left.

Why: The train left before I arrived: for this “earlier” you need was + participle, not is.

✕ Not like this

Ik was mijn pas vergeten thuis.

✓ Correct

Ik had mijn pas thuis vergeten.

I had left my card at home.

Why: thuis comes before the participle, not after it. Either auxiliary works here: had vergeten and was vergeten are both correct.

✕ Not like this

Nadat we aten, gingen we weg.

✓ Correct

Nadat we hadden gegeten, gingen we weg.

After we had eaten, we left.

Why: After nadat, you need the past perfect, otherwise the sequence of events is lost.

✕ Not like this

Hij had naar Eindhoven gegaan.

✓ Correct

Hij was naar Eindhoven gegaan.

He had gone to Eindhoven.

Why: Verbs of movement that involve a change of place use zijn → was.

✕ Not like this

We hadden geweest in het dorp.

✓ Correct

We waren in het dorp geweest.

We had been to the village.

Why: zijn conjugates with zijn: was/waren geweest.

Woordenlijst

  • nadat

    after

    Nadat ik had gebeld, kwam er meteen iemand.

  • inmiddels

    by that time, meanwhileneutraal

    De winkel was inmiddels gesloten.

  • al

    already

    Ze waren al vertrokken.

  • net

    just now

    De bus was net weg.

  • leeglopen

    to run out of battery, to empty

    Mijn telefoon was leeggelopen.

  • laten liggen

    to leave behind, to forget (an item)

    Ik had mijn sleutels op kantoor laten liggen.

  • achteraf

    in retrospect, afterwards

    Achteraf bleek dat ik het formulier verkeerd had ingevuld.

  • uiteindelijk

    in the end

    Uiteindelijk was alles goed gekomen.

Found a mistake or something unclear in this lesson? Send me a note →